.
.
Subject: Re: people control through subcouncil-2-subcouncil system with immediate representation
.
.
.
.
.
.


 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
[...]

Oops: this was meant to be about a 1st order council (simpler).

In a 2nd order council to remove someone the voter-group in question
that is behind that person could appoint someone else instead. But
then that person is only falling out of that council, forcing the
delegates-section that was also behind that delegate to appoint someone
new from their section.

The other way is by that section only, to assemble and appoint someone
else, in which case the delegate on the 2nd order council in question
would still be part of the 'grand-governing-council' that is all 1st order
delegates for that 2nd council (in this system).

Sometimes it may be possible to be quicker on the 2nd level, because
chosen delegate sections can be presumed to be much more motivated to
work through the system and show a lot of interest in the subjects under
discussion/review. At other times, when many 1st order delegates need
to be replaced to affect the 2nd order council eventually, it may be
more work. When a very few delegates behave strangely the 2nd order
council that is not large will be relatively quick because the section
of delegates will move quickly and with interest. When the 2nd order
council is standing on a great many delegates by that number it becomes
slower again (slower in changing the membership that is; the subcouncil
proceedings on any level are the same and would happen with the same
speeds: all 50 persons and 5 subcouncils of 10, same procedures and
numbers, whether local in a corner of a neighborhood, a large city,
or the whole nation.).