.
.
Subject: Re: Austerity measures are a great idea ... on the banks/financials.
.
.
.
.
.
.


 > ...
 > ...
[...]
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
[...]

Rod, good to see you are back on a roll.

The best thing done so far is a mix of capitalism (free trade!),
and socialism, is because it is closest to the system I outlined.
What is good in the current system is *not* the financial layer.
But it is the free initiative, the failure of bad corporations,
free trade in products and services, and not having the soil
controlled by barons and so on anymore, and a higher then almost
ever (dare I say: ever) of state democracy (now, as before, under
dire threat from the financial layer, who love dictatorship in the
corporations for maximum profit.)

To reiterate: this situation is best because it is closest ever
to my design, and going into my design was probably never a smaller
step then now (for western society at least, american indian society was
often already there, but you destroyed that and you don't even know it;
their designs where maybe simpler - didn't need to be complex because
they where stone-age - but essentially they where going great, Israel
was also close but they messed it up beoynd repair with their state
tyranny that they wanted.).

Now I have said too much, and the birdbrains have become confused again :(.
No fuckwits, it is science, and then compared to what other nations have
done, which usually doesn't square much, but sometimes it does quite a
bit. What nations ? The most famous and honored in the whole world that is,
such as Israel and the native north american indians. They did so great
because they where even closer to this design then the current
capitalism / socialism mix (which now seems headed for a war, that could
eject the financial layer and socialize it perhaps finally, causing the
model to converge even closer to the truth of economics).

It's a time of doom ? Rather a time of hope for better, because the
idiotic finance layer is self destructing, attempting to drag with it
the entire world but it's not a guarantee they'll succeed in that. We
could end up unzipping and booting them, erect another component of the
truth in economics in real life (depending in big ways on adequate state
democracy, though, so we need to strike a dual blow: for a more strictly
non-corrupt democratic state, and then have that wield the finance power
in a localized setup, distributed into many small funds controlled by
the people in those localities.)
--