.
.
Subject: What world would you think is better to live in ?
.
.
.
.
.

There appear to be 3 plans:
A. The plan of the transnational capital elites, a new high tech dark
   ages.
B. The people in general, who as usual think everything will remain the
   same, which is not going to happen and anyway the people are not even
   trying to make that a reality either.
C. www.socialism.nl
D. Failing plans, economic disintegration in its totality, mass death,
   slowly recouperating areas/nations, potentially ... another 14th
   century Europe disaster, ongoing.

Plans B and D are not really plans, the former won't happen it is merely
a naive fiction and the latter can happen under any plan and is by
definition not good (though in my opinion better then plan A.) B. and D.
are non-action, in terms of will we only have to discuss A. and C.
Short sketch of either:

A. There are countless ways this dystopia can be done. A typical low
   ranking individual would live a life of hard work, barely no pay,
   virtually no security, 3rd world disaster conditions. Earth would
   probably be transformed into a series of blocks holding a certain
   amount of worker-bee people who are never allowed to get out until
   they reach a certain rank, and so on. Achieving higher ranks would
   be tied in with abusing other people. Nature would only be supplied
   to the worker-bees to keep them sane enough to work, and happy enough
   not to rebel en masse. The pressure is put on to such a degree that
   some sectors do rebel, all these specimen are culled by inbuild
   weapons.

   I'm not going to get into a lot of detail, lest giving the enemy
   more ideas then they probably already have. Culture would be directed
   to promote violence. People on the lower ranks would probably not get
   very old, perhaps up to 60 or less. Human on human abuses would be
   pervasive and basically what the whole day is about, who abuses whom
   for what etc etc.

   The higher ranks manipulate and control the lower ranks as a matter
   of brutally cold science of the Nazi/Eugenics kind. It would
   basically be a hell run by and for demons.

   People think they know exactly why they do this, it was a natural
   concequence of evolutionary law: peace has been overcome, it was a
   mistake.

C. In my plan every person has a birthright to soil, housing can be
   build wherever the people in the area agree to that using a system of
   block representation and council democracy, referendum power, and
   above all the general free debate between all people. There would be
   all kinds of specialized free businesses who sell and trade their
   goods for their own sake, costumers free to choose what they want to
   buy, and the money system would be what the people in that nation
   want it to be, most likely a combination of cash and electronic as
   we have now. The nation would be a fully sovereign entity unto
   itself, roughly around the 30 million people. People can travel to
   other nations if these other nations want that, which is likely
   because tourism is profitable. The nations trade with each other,
   but prevent wage abuses to decimate their home industries. Talk and
   press are free, science is much state funded to keep it objective.
   General life is sweet, people are rarely abusing each other, war
   is considdered an absurdity of the childhood past of humanity.
   Music is made, individual rights are treasured higher then gold.
   The businesses tend to all be democracrasies, finance is directed
   along the general mass will of the people, to help the people rather
   then to produce profitable operations for self-enrichment of fund
   owners. Society is pervaded with a sense of awe and respect. The
   great incomprehensible miracle of existence and life.

   People think they know exactly why they do this, it was a natural
   concequence of evolutionary law: war has been overcome, it was a
   mistake.
-- 
http://www.socialism.nl