Housekeeper and delegate of a voter-group: same person or not
-------------------------------------------------------------

It is probably in general better that the housekeeper of a voter-block,
and its delegate are not the same person. That way power in the voter-block
is spread around more, the housekeeper acts as an anker inside the
voter-block away from the political issues, as a bulwark against the
possible rethoric (demagoguery) from the delegate when in debate with
its own voter-block. Another problem is that a delegate who is also the
housekeeper of its voter-block can become intoxicated with its own power,
and therefore may develop a tendency to behave less decently in the councils,
causing unneccesary frictions. The voters in that block may on the other hand
cower from the delegate, turning the power relations between the voter
block and delegate upside down (the voter-block should rule the delegate.)
The proposed law however says:

_3.1.d People Government   
 One group of adults assemble out of their own initiative.
 Once they have chosen from between them a vote block housekeeper
 that is responsible for correct voter registration and verification, 
 they are allowed to have one representative, which can be anyone in
 or out of that block. The People or in their absence the Country
 Council decide on the minimum size of a voter group.

 The minimum size for a voter group is: ..50 

They can elect "anyone in or out of that block," hence this also
includes the housekeeper. This problem is probably an oversight, I
did mean it as two different persons. On the other hand one may
ask: what right does any law have to minutely detail what a relatively
small group of only 50 persons do, how they want to organize themselves ?
Perhaps this should stay a recommendation in that case.

Propose to add to this law 3.1.d: "The housekeeper and the delegate
of the voter-block are not the same person."