_3.2.a-3 Law Court   
     The Country has one Court deciding over disputes of law itself.  

        _3.2.a-3.1 Law Court, Judges   
         Law Court Judges are approved by the People or in their absence
         the Country Council, see Article 3.1.d-5, Country Council. 
         
         Law Court Judges are older then 40 years, each has served
         as a Judge in other courts a minimum of 20 years.  

        _3.2.a-3.5 Supreme Law Court   
         The Supreme Law Court is the assembly of all Law Court Judges,
         who rule by their own majority. It has jurisdiction over sensitive 
         cases concerning Constitutional Law, such as - but not limited to - 
         cases involving the Electoral Committee, the King, and the Country 
         Council. 

The problem with this is that the Country Council might want to install
judges to the law court, and that way influence cases that are between
the law court and the CC, which is what many cases may be about because
they involve legislation from the councils.

It may be better to add a qualification that a judge its approval only
becomes effective after the next general election of delegates. The
court is then shielded from the influence of the current delegates,
who may be the ones in court contesting a case.

One could say "but the People are not absent" when there is already
judges, but that is too vague, especially because the judges are likely
already routinely installed by the CC.

        _3.2.a-3.1 Law Court, Judges   
         Law Court Judges are approved by the People or in their absence
         the Country Council, see Article 3.1.d-5, Country Council. 
         
         Law Court Judges are older then 40 years, each has served
         as a Judge in other courts a minimum of 20 years.  
         
         The by the Country Council once approved Law Court Judge(s)
         only become Law Court Judges when there has been one general
         general election of delegates in the nation, and the
         approval is upheld by that new Country Council.

This ratifies the addition to the Law Court through the general
elections back to the People, causing it to have a better mandate.
The demand to have it twice approved by the CC is then only in case
when 'the People in their absence' do not do it. How do the People
install a Judge: for example by Referendum. Since Referendum is not
mentioned, and the People is contrasted with the CC here, and the
CC can be an indicted party, it seems that the more reasonable
mechanism would be that it is a Referendum without the CC filling
in the abstentions, but where a large majority of the people wants to 
install the new judge. However now we get into the usual problems
with Referendums again: 'what is a functional majority' and 'what
about is an amount of voters that is enough' ? Then we would be
back with the 3.1.b Referendum, which the People can also use. One
could say: the 3.1.b Referendum is still good as a way of representing
the will of the people, because in the time when the Referendum is
coming about the People have the chance to change their delegates.

The above addition at least prevents a CC to add new judges to the
law court. I'd say this is a mistake in the Constitution as presented
before, this way the problem might be corrected.

Another solution for a 3.1.b nation wide Referendum where the People
want to install a law court judge, is that not the CC fills the
abstentions, but all the delegates in the nation.